Adventskalender vs Pistache cranberry hazelnoot wit
Overall, Pistache cranberry hazelnoot wit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Adventskalender | Pistache cranberry hazelnoot... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 576 kcal | 548 kcal |
| Fat | 38 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 22 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 48 g | 47 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 9.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Nuts, Soybeans | Milk, Nuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pistache cranberry hazelnoot wit has 27% less saturated fat (16 g vs 22 g).
- Pistache cranberry hazelnoot wit has 22% more fiber (1.8 g vs 1.4 g).
- Pistache cranberry hazelnoot wit has 43% more protein (9.4 g vs 5.4 g).
- Pistache cranberry hazelnoot wit is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Adventskalender
Zucker, Palmöl, Kakaobutter, Süssmolkenpulver (aus Milch), Magermilchpulver, Kakaomasse, Butterreinfett, Sahnepulver (2 %), Emulgator (Sojalecithine), Haselnussmasse, Aromen.
Pistache cranberry hazelnoot wit
Suiker, vollemelk - poeder, cacaoboter, pistachenoot, hazelnoot, 4,2% pistachenootpasta, 4,1% gedroogde cranberry, emul - gator (sojalecithine 522]), zee - zout, natuurlijk van learoma, zonnebloemolie.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Adventskalender or Pistache cranberry hazelnoot wit?
Overall, Pistache cranberry hazelnoot wit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pistache cranberry hazelnoot wit has fewer calories: 548 kcal versus 576 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pistache cranberry hazelnoot wit has less sugar: 47 g versus 48 g per 100 g.