Comparison

Droste puur chocolade vs Pistache cranberry hazelnoot wit

Overall, Pistache cranberry hazelnoot wit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDroste puur chocoladePistache cranberry hazelnoot...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 553 kcal 548 kcal
Fat 33 g 35 g
Saturated fat 20 g 16 g
Sugars 47 g 47 g
Salt 0 g 0.4 g
Fiber 4 g 1.8 g
Protein 5.1 g 9.4 g
Additives00
AllergensSoybeansMilk, Nuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pistache cranberry hazelnoot wit has 20% less saturated fat (16 g vs 20 g).
  • Droste puur chocolade has no salt, while Pistache cranberry hazelnoot wit has 0.4 g.
  • Droste puur chocolade has 55% more fiber (4 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Pistache cranberry hazelnoot wit has 46% more protein (9.4 g vs 5.1 g).
  • Pistache cranberry hazelnoot wit is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Pistache cranberry hazelnoot wit lists: Milk, Nuts.

Ingredients

Droste puur chocolade

Suiker, cacaomassa* (herkomst EU), cacaoboter* (herkomst EU), emulgator (_soja_lecithine), aroma (vanille). *=Rainforest Alliance Certified.

Pistache cranberry hazelnoot wit

Suiker, vollemelk - poeder, cacaoboter, pistachenoot, hazelnoot, 4,2% pistachenootpasta, 4,1% gedroogde cranberry, emul - gator (sojalecithine 522]), zee - zout, natuurlijk van learoma, zonnebloemolie.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Droste puur chocolade or Pistache cranberry hazelnoot wit?

Overall, Pistache cranberry hazelnoot wit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pistache cranberry hazelnoot wit has fewer calories: 548 kcal versus 553 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Droste puur chocolade has less sugar: 47 g versus 47 g per 100 g.

More comparisons