Ace passion fruit vs Si & No Legumi Bio
Overall, Ace passion fruit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ace passion fruit | Si & No Legumi Bio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 40 kcal | 422 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 10.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 8.4 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | 6.8 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 13.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ace passion fruit has 91% fewer calories (40 kcal vs 422 kcal).
- Ace passion fruit has 99% less fat (0.1 g vs 10.5 g).
- Ace passion fruit has no saturated fat, while Si & No Legumi Bio has 1.5 g.
- Si & No Legumi Bio has 87% less sugar (1.1 g vs 8.4 g).
- Ace passion fruit has 98% less salt (0 g vs 0.9 g).
- Si & No Legumi Bio has 99% more fiber (6.8 g vs 0.1 g).
- Si & No Legumi Bio has 98% more protein (13.7 g vs 0.3 g).
Ingredients
Ace passion fruit
fin: voir ci-dessus. 1000 ml e use. Serv store in within 8 001440 134067 avant overture pour 2-3 CONSER agricola 40068 (BO). S di Coti HO TA RAC PLA da LE LA
Si & No Legumi Bio
Mais* 57%, legumi* 30% (ortaggi in proporzione variabile: piselli*, fagioli*, lenticchie*, ceci*) oli vegetali* (girasole* e mais*), proteine di pisello*, sale marino, estratto naturale di oliva*, *da agricoltura biologica ✓Può contenere latte e soia ✔
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ace passion fruit or Si & No Legumi Bio?
Overall, Ace passion fruit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ace passion fruit has fewer calories: 40 kcal versus 422 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Si & No Legumi Bio has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 8.4 g per 100 g.