Comparison

Curry Mango Papaya vs Ace passion fruit

Overall, Ace passion fruit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCurry Mango PapayaAce passion fruit
Nutri-Score d b
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 363 kcal 40 kcal
Fat 34 g 0.1 g
Saturated fat 3.1 g 0 g
Sugars 6.1 g 8.4 g
Salt 1.3 g 0 g
Fiber 2.6 g 0.1 g
Protein 5.1 g 0.3 g
Additives00
AllergensMustardNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ace passion fruit has 89% fewer calories (40 kcal vs 363 kcal).
  • Ace passion fruit has 100% less fat (0.1 g vs 34 g).
  • Ace passion fruit has no saturated fat, while Curry Mango Papaya has 3.1 g.
  • Curry Mango Papaya has 27% less sugar (6.1 g vs 8.4 g).
  • Ace passion fruit has 98% less salt (0 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Curry Mango Papaya has 96% more fiber (2.6 g vs 0.1 g).
  • Curry Mango Papaya has 94% more protein (5.1 g vs 0.3 g).
  • Ace passion fruit has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Curry Mango Papaya lists: Mustard.

Ingredients

Curry Mango Papaya

Sonnenblumenöl*, Sonnenblumenkerne*, Wasser, Papaya* 10%, Mango* 10% , Zitronensaft* aus Ziftronensaftkonzentrat*, Äpfel*, Currypulver*, Apfelessig*, Apfelsaftkonzentrat*, Rohrohrzucker*, Meersalz, Gewürze*, _Senfmehl*_

Ace passion fruit

fin: voir ci-dessus. 1000 ml e use. Serv store in within 8 001440 134067 avant overture pour 2-3 CONSER agricola 40068 (BO). S di Coti HO TA RAC PLA da LE LA

FAQ

Which is healthier: Curry Mango Papaya or Ace passion fruit?

Overall, Ace passion fruit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ace passion fruit has fewer calories: 40 kcal versus 363 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Curry Mango Papaya has less sugar: 6.1 g versus 8.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons