Comparison

A La Szarlotka vs Riskrem Med Jordbærsaus

Overall, A La Szarlotka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientA La SzarlotkaRiskrem Med Jordbærsaus
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 84 kcal 141 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 5 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 3.1 g
Sugars 18 g 12.6 g
Salt 0 g 0.3 g
Fiber 1.3 g —
Protein 1.4 g 2.9 g
Additives03
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • A La Szarlotka has 40% fewer calories (84 kcal vs 141 kcal).
  • A La Szarlotka has 90% less fat (0.5 g vs 5 g).
  • A La Szarlotka has 90% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Riskrem Med Jordbærsaus has 30% less sugar (12.6 g vs 18 g).
  • Riskrem Med Jordbærsaus has 52% more protein (2.9 g vs 1.4 g).

Ingredients

A La Szarlotka

Gotowany grys ryżowy 30% (woda, grys ryżowy), przecier jabłkowy 20%, jogurt naturalny 15 %, zagęszczony sok jabłkowy, woda, sok bananowy z zagęszczonego soku, przecier bananowy, cynamon 0,06 %, aromat

Riskrem Med Jordbærsaus

RISKREM (81%): Helmelk, 13 % ris, kremfløte, sukker*, proteinredusert skummetmelk, emulgator (melkesyreestere av mono - og diglyserider av fettsyrer), stabilisator (pektiner, gellan-gummi), aroma, salt. JORDBÆRSAUS (19 %): 63 % jordbær, sukker*, vann, modifisert stivelse, stabilisator (pektiner), surhetsregulerende middel (sitronsyre), aroma, konserveringsmiddel (kaliumsorbat). *Totalt 9% tilsatt sukker.

FAQ

Which is healthier: A La Szarlotka or Riskrem Med Jordbærsaus?

Overall, A La Szarlotka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

A La Szarlotka has fewer calories: 84 kcal versus 141 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Riskrem Med Jordbærsaus has less sugar: 12.6 g versus 18 g per 100 g.

More comparisons