Comparison

90% 10% Gound Beef vs Aberdeen angus

Overall, 90% 10% Gound Beef has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient90% 10% Gound BeefAberdeen angus
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 179 kcal 320 kcal
Fat 9.8 g 24.4 g
Saturated fat 4 g 9.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0.2 g
Salt 0.2 g 20.3 g
Fiber 0 g 0.7 g
Protein 19.6 g 24.2 g
Additives00
AllergensBeefNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 90% 10% Gound Beef has 44% fewer calories (179 kcal vs 320 kcal).
  • 90% 10% Gound Beef has 60% less fat (9.8 g vs 24.4 g).
  • 90% 10% Gound Beef has 57% less saturated fat (4 g vs 9.3 g).
  • 90% 10% Gound Beef has 99% less salt (0.2 g vs 20.3 g).
  • Aberdeen angus has 100% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0 g).
  • Aberdeen angus has 19% more protein (24.2 g vs 19.6 g).
  • 90% 10% Gound Beef has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only 90% 10% Gound Beef lists: Beef.

Ingredients

90% 10% Gound Beef

BEEF

Aberdeen angus

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: 90% 10% Gound Beef or Aberdeen angus?

Overall, 90% 10% Gound Beef has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

90% 10% Gound Beef has fewer calories: 179 kcal versus 320 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

90% 10% Gound Beef has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons