Comparison
Aberdeen angus vs Burger Big Beef
Overall, Burger Big Beef has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Aberdeen angus | Burger Big Beef |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 320 kcal | 199 kcal |
| Fat | 24.4 g | 14 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.3 g | 6.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 20.3 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | — |
| Protein | 24.2 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Burger Big Beef has 38% fewer calories (199 kcal vs 320 kcal).
- Burger Big Beef has 43% less fat (14 g vs 24.4 g).
- Burger Big Beef has 33% less saturated fat (6.2 g vs 9.3 g).
- Burger Big Beef has 97% less salt (0.6 g vs 20.3 g).
- Aberdeen angus has 26% more protein (24.2 g vs 18 g).
- Burger Big Beef has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Aberdeen angus
Not available.
Burger Big Beef
Storfekjøtt (99 %), salt, pepper
FAQ
Which is healthier: Aberdeen angus or Burger Big Beef?
Overall, Burger Big Beef has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Burger Big Beef has fewer calories: 199 kcal versus 320 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Burger Big Beef has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.