Aberdeen angus vs Steak
Overall, Steak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Aberdeen angus | Steak |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 320 kcal | 252 kcal |
| Fat | 24.4 g | 18.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.3 g | 7.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 20.3 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 24.2 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Steak has 21% fewer calories (252 kcal vs 320 kcal).
- Steak has 23% less fat (18.7 g vs 24.4 g).
- Steak has 16% less saturated fat (7.8 g vs 9.3 g).
- Aberdeen angus has 66% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Steak has 96% less salt (0.7 g vs 20.3 g).
- Aberdeen angus has 100% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0 g).
- Aberdeen angus has 26% more protein (24.2 g vs 18 g).
- Steak has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Aberdeen angus
Not available.
Steak
Ingredients 50% Irish Beef Chuck, 43% Irish Beef Brisket, Seasoning (Pea Fibre, Pea Starch, Potato Starch, Salt, Rice Flour, Natural Flavouring, Dextrose, Yeast Extract Powder, Preservative: Sodium Metabisulphite). Additional In See reverse f Produced in protective a
FAQ
Which is healthier: Aberdeen angus or Steak?
Overall, Steak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Steak has fewer calories: 252 kcal versus 320 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Aberdeen angus has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.