4 Tranches de filet de Cabillaud vs Cabillaud sauvage surgelé
Overall, 4 Tranches de filet de Cabillaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
4 Tranches de filet de Cabillaud
Cabillaud sauvage surgelé
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 4 Tranches de filet de Cabil... | Cabillaud sauvage surgelé |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 77 kcal | 195 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 7.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 4 Tranches de filet de Cabillaud has 61% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 195 kcal).
- 4 Tranches de filet de Cabillaud has 92% less fat (0.6 g vs 7.7 g).
- 4 Tranches de filet de Cabillaud has 92% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.3 g).
- Cabillaud sauvage surgelé has 44% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0.5 g).
- 4 Tranches de filet de Cabillaud has 22% more protein (18 g vs 14 g).
- 4 Tranches de filet de Cabillaud is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Cabillaud sauvage surgelé lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
4 Tranches de filet de Cabillaud
Cabillaud 100%
Cabillaud sauvage surgelé
Cabillaud 65%, farine de blé 14%, chapelure 7,1% (dont farine de blé 6,6%), huile de colza, eau, amidon de blé, arôme naturel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: 4 Tranches de filet de Cabillaud or Cabillaud sauvage surgelé?
Overall, 4 Tranches de filet de Cabillaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
4 Tranches de filet de Cabillaud has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 195 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
4 Tranches de filet de Cabillaud has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.