Cabillaud sauvage surgelé vs Filets de Cabillaud MSC
Overall, Filets de Cabillaud MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cabillaud sauvage surgelé | Filets de Cabillaud MSC |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 195 kcal | 74 kcal |
| Fat | 7.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets de Cabillaud MSC has 62% fewer calories (74 kcal vs 195 kcal).
- Filets de Cabillaud MSC has 94% less fat (0.5 g vs 7.7 g).
- Filets de Cabillaud MSC has 62% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.3 g).
- Cabillaud sauvage surgelé has 44% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0.5 g).
- Filets de Cabillaud MSC has 18% more protein (17 g vs 14 g).
- Only Cabillaud sauvage surgelé lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Cabillaud sauvage surgelé
Cabillaud 65%, farine de blé 14%, chapelure 7,1% (dont farine de blé 6,6%), huile de colza, eau, amidon de blé, arôme naturel.
Filets de Cabillaud MSC
4 portions de filets de Cabillaud (Gadus morhua) , pêché au chalut en océan Atlantique Nord-Est (mer de Barents et mers de Norvège), surgelées.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cabillaud sauvage surgelé or Filets de Cabillaud MSC?
Overall, Filets de Cabillaud MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de Cabillaud MSC has fewer calories: 74 kcal versus 195 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cabillaud sauvage surgelé has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.