4 pavés de filet d'autruche marinés - cuits congelés vs Strucc steak
Overall, 4 pavés de filet d'autruche marinés - cuits congelés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
4 pavés de filet d'autruche marinés - cuits congelés
Strucc steak
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 4 pavés de filet d'autruche... | Strucc steak |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 118 kcal | 126 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 2.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 26 g | 25.8 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 4 pavés de filet d'autruche marinés - cuits congelés has 30% less fat (1.6 g vs 2.3 g).
- Strucc steak has 27% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.1 g).
- 4 pavés de filet d'autruche marinés - cuits congelés has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
4 pavés de filet d'autruche marinés - cuits congelés
Filet d'autruche 98 % (Afrique du Sud), eau, sel, fibre de citron, stabilisant : citrates de sodium, correcteurs d'acidité : carbonates de sodium.
Strucc steak
92% strucchús, ivóvíz, stabilizátor: nátrium-citrátok; glükózszirup, étkezési só, savanyúságot szabályozó anyag: nátrium-karbonátok; fűszerkivonatok
FAQ
Which is healthier: 4 pavés de filet d'autruche marinés - cuits congelés or Strucc steak?
Overall, 4 pavés de filet d'autruche marinés - cuits congelés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
4 pavés de filet d'autruche marinés - cuits congelés has fewer calories: 118 kcal versus 126 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
4 pavés de filet d'autruche marinés - cuits congelés has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.