3 vs Pinsa
Overall, Pinsa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 3 | Pinsa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 476 kcal | 263 kcal |
| Fat | 19.1 g | 4.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.6 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 28.6 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 3.3 g |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 9.4 g |
| Additives | 4 | 1 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pinsa has 45% fewer calories (263 kcal vs 476 kcal).
- Pinsa has 75% less fat (4.8 g vs 19.1 g).
- Pinsa has 75% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 3.6 g).
- Pinsa has 89% less sugar (3.1 g vs 28.6 g).
- 3 has 53% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.8 g).
- 3 has 54% more fiber (7.1 g vs 3.3 g).
- Pinsa has 24% more protein (9.4 g vs 7.1 g).
- Pinsa has the better Nutri-Score.
- Pinsa is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only 3 lists: Soybeans.
- Only Pinsa lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
3
Whole Grain Oats, Sugar, Canola and/or Sunflower Oil, Rice Flour, Honey, Salt, Brown Sugar Syrup, Baking Soda, Soy Lecithin, Natural Flavor, Dark Chocolate Pieces (sugar, chocolate liquor, cocoa butter, soy lecithin, natural flavor, salt), Cocoa.
Pinsa
Weizenmehl 47%, Wasser, Hartweizengrieß, Sauerteig 4,2% (Wasser, Weizenmehl), natives Olivenöl extra 3,5%, Salz, Hefe, Gerstenmalzmehl, Ethylalkohol. Kann Spuren von Soja und Senf enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: 3 or Pinsa?
Overall, Pinsa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pinsa has fewer calories: 263 kcal versus 476 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pinsa has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 28.6 g per 100 g.