Comparison

25 Blinis Apéro vs 16 Blinis cocktail 135g BIO

Overall, 25 Blinis Apéro has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient25 Blinis Apéro16 Blinis cocktail 135g BIO
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 235 kcal 224 kcal
Fat 9.2 g 9.8 g
Saturated fat 0.8 g 1.2 g
Sugars 4.7 g 2.7 g
Salt 1.7 g 1.7 g
Fiber 4.1 g 1.9 g
Protein 4.7 g 5.6 g
Additives55
AllergensEggs, Gluten, MilkEggs, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 25 Blinis Apéro has 33% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
  • 16 Blinis cocktail 135g BIO has 43% less sugar (2.7 g vs 4.7 g).
  • 25 Blinis Apéro has 54% more fiber (4.1 g vs 1.9 g).
  • 16 Blinis cocktail 135g BIO has 16% more protein (5.6 g vs 4.7 g).
  • 25 Blinis Apéro has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

25 Blinis Apéro

Eau, farine de _blé_, huile de colza, _lactose _et protéines de _lait_, fibres de _blé_, poudres à lever : phosphate monocalcique et carbonates de sodium, _oeufs_ entiers en poudre, sel, acidifiant (acide lactique), épaississant : gomme guar.

16 Blinis cocktail 135g BIO

Eau - farine de blé* 26% - huile de tournesol* - poudre de lait écrémé* - farine de sarrasin* 1,5% - poudres à lever : E341(i) et E500(ii) - poudre d'œuf entier* - sel - sucre de canne* - épaississant : E412. Traces éventuelles de soja et sésame. *Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique.

FAQ

Which is healthier: 25 Blinis Apéro or 16 Blinis cocktail 135g BIO?

Overall, 25 Blinis Apéro has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

16 Blinis cocktail 135g BIO has fewer calories: 224 kcal versus 235 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

16 Blinis cocktail 135g BIO has less sugar: 2.7 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons