Comparison

12 cônes sucres vs Farofa Tradicional

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient12 cônes sucresFarofa Tradicional
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 403 kcal 406 kcal
Fat 5.3 g 9.1 g
Saturated fat 4.1 g 4 g
Sugars 31 g 0 g
Salt 0.1 g 1.4 g
Fiber — 8 g
Protein 6.8 g 1.1 g
Additives20
AllergensGlutenGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 12 cônes sucres has 42% less fat (5.3 g vs 9.1 g).
  • Farofa Tradicional has no sugar, while 12 cônes sucres has 31 g.
  • 12 cônes sucres has 94% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.4 g).
  • 12 cônes sucres has 84% more protein (6.8 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Farofa Tradicional has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Farofa Tradicional lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

12 cônes sucres

matière grasse 6,1g , dont acide gras saturé 4,64g, glucides 82,6g, dont suc res 33g, protéines 6,8g , sel 0.009g. farine de blé (gluten), sucre, matière grasse végétale (coprah), fibre de blé (gluten), émulsifiant: lechithines de soja, colorant : caramel ordinaire, acidifiant : carbonates de magnésium, sel.

Farofa Tradicional

Harina de yuca/mandioca, aceites vegetales, ajo, sal, colorante (harina de maíz enriquecido com hierro y ácido fólico, aceite vegetal de soja y colorante natural achiote), cebolla, pimiento rojo, pimienta negra, cebolla verde, aromatizante e glutamato monosódico (potenciador de sabor). Contiene derivados de soya. Puede contener glúten (trigo).

FAQ

Which is healthier: 12 cônes sucres or Farofa Tradicional?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

12 cônes sucres has fewer calories: 403 kcal versus 406 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Farofa Tradicional has less sugar: 0 g versus 31 g per 100 g.

More comparisons