100% Grass Fed & Finished Ground Beef vs Naudan jauheliha
Overall, 100% Grass Fed & Finished Ground Beef has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 100% Grass Fed & Finished Gr... | Naudan jauheliha |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 152 kcal | 170 kcal |
| Fat | 7.1 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 4 g | 4.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 100% Grass Fed & Finished Ground Beef has 11% fewer calories (152 kcal vs 170 kcal).
- 100% Grass Fed & Finished Ground Beef has 29% less fat (7.1 g vs 10 g).
- 100% Grass Fed & Finished Ground Beef has 11% less saturated fat (4 g vs 4.5 g).
Ingredients
100% Grass Fed & Finished Ground Beef
Ground Beef
Naudan jauheliha
Naudanliha 100 %.
FAQ
Which is healthier: 100% Grass Fed & Finished Ground Beef or Naudan jauheliha?
Overall, 100% Grass Fed & Finished Ground Beef has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
100% Grass Fed & Finished Ground Beef has fewer calories: 152 kcal versus 170 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
100% Grass Fed & Finished Ground Beef has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.