Nutrition report ready

Traditionskasserel Nacken

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices for this Traditionelle Art Metzgerfrisch product.

Nutri-Score D

View details

Traditionskasserel Nacken

by Traditionelle Art Metzgerfrisch in Meats Barcode 2816455008069
Poor nutritional quality

Traditionskasserel Nacken by Traditionelle Art Metzgerfrisch provides 184 kcal per 100 g, with 1 g of sugars and 17 g of protein. Its Nutri-Score is D. It is listed in the Meats category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
12 g · Moderate
Saturated fat
4.8 g · Moderate
Sugars
1 g · Low
Salt
1.9 g · High

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 184 kcal 205 −10%
Total fat 12 g 12.9 −7%
Saturated fat 4.8 g 4.8
Carbohydrates 2 g 3.6 −44%
Total sugars 1 g 1
Protein 17 g 18.4 −7%
Salt 1.9 g 1.5 +26%

Category average across 3356 Meats products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other meats

Calories lower 48%
Sugars higher 28%
Salt higher 25%
Saturated fat higher 39%
Protein top 61%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Labels & certifications
No gluten
Sold in
Germany
Barcode
2816455008069

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Traditionskasserel Nacken?

Traditionskasserel Nacken contains 184 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Traditionskasserel Nacken?

Traditionskasserel Nacken has 1 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Traditionskasserel Nacken healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 26, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Traditionskasserel Nacken? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More meats

View all →