
View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Thai Spicy Dipping Sauce Nam Jim Jaew
Thai Spicy Dipping Sauce Nam Jim Jaew by Healthy boy brand provides 172 kcal per 100 g, with 33 g of sugars and 3.3 g of protein. That is 235% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Groceries category and comes in a 165g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 172 kcal | 194 −11% |
| Total fat | 0.5 g | 12.8 −96% |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 2.4 −96% |
| Carbohydrates | 38 g | 16.2 +135% |
| Total sugars | 33 g | 9.8 +235% |
| Added sugars | 0 g | 4.8 −100% |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 2.8 +17% |
| Salt | 5.6 g | 5.9 −5% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 59921 Groceries products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other groceries
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
eau, sucre, sirop de fructose, pâte de tamarin, sel. pinent rouge, vinaigré naturel, amidon de tapioca modifié, Correcteur d'acidité: E334, exhausteur de goût : E621, stabilisant: E415
Additives 3
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 165g
- Sold in
- France
- Barcode
- 8850206121656
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Thai Spicy Dipping Sauce Nam Jim Jaew?
Thai Spicy Dipping Sauce Nam Jim Jaew contains 172 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Thai Spicy Dipping Sauce Nam Jim Jaew?
Thai Spicy Dipping Sauce Nam Jim Jaew has 33 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Thai Spicy Dipping Sauce Nam Jim Jaew healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 17, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 3
a NOVA 1
b NOVA 1
b NOVA 3 More groceries
View all →
NOVA 2
d NOVA 4
c
e
e NOVA 4
c NOVA 3 More from Healthy boy brand
View all →
NOVA 4
e NOVA 4
e NOVA 4
e NOVA 4
e
NOVA 4