Nutrition report ready

Sucre d'érable

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices.

Nutri-Score E NOVA 2

View details

Sucre d'érable

in Sugars Barcode 3760101800288
Bad nutritional quality
Processed culinary ingredient
Green-Score
a
Environmental impact estimate

Sucre d'érable provides 377 kcal per 100 g, with 98.3 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. That is 28% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 2 (processed culinary ingredient). It is listed in the Sugars category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
0 g · Low
Saturated fat
0 g · Low
Sugars
98.3 g · High
Salt
0 g · Low

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 377 kcal 303 +24%
Total fat 0 g 0.5 −100%
Saturated fat 0 g 0.3 −100%
Carbohydrates 98.3 g 89.9 +9%
Total sugars 98.3 g 76.9 +28%
Protein 0 g 0.3 −100%
Salt 0 g 0.2 −100%

Category average across 2024 Sugars products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other sugars

Calories higher 45%
Sugars lower 43%
Salt lower 1%
Saturated fat lower 1%
Protein top 100%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Sold in
France
Barcode
3760101800288

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Sucre d'érable?

Sucre d'érable contains 377 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Sucre d'érable?

Sucre d'érable has 98.3 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Sucre d'érable healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 2 — processed culinary ingredient. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 20, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Sucre d'érable? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More sugars

View all →