Steack haché avec des pommes de terre au four

in Hamburgers Barcode 8433308004791
Average nutritional quality

Steack haché avec des pommes de terre au four provides 160 kcal per 100 g, with 0.6 g of sugars and 7 g of protein. That is 89% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is C. It is listed in the Hamburgers category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
9.2 g · Moderate
Saturated fat
7.1 g · High
Sugars
0.6 g · Low
Salt
0.4 g · Moderate

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 160 kcal 335 −52%
Total fat 9.2 g 24.3 −62%
Saturated fat 7.1 g 9.1 −22%
Carbohydrates 9.7 g 24.4 −60%
Total sugars 0.6 g 5.3 −89%
Protein 7 g 22.3 −69%
Salt 0.4 g 2.4 −83%

Category average across 1425 Hamburgers products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other hamburgers

Calories lower 20%
Sugars lower 18%
Salt lower 11%
Saturated fat higher 43%
Protein top 87%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Sold in
France, Spain
Barcode
8433308004791

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Steack haché avec des pommes de terre au four?

Steack haché avec des pommes de terre au four contains 160 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Steack haché avec des pommes de terre au four?

Steack haché avec des pommes de terre au four has 0.6 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Steack haché avec des pommes de terre au four healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of C (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 13, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Steack haché avec des pommes de terre au four? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More hamburgers

View all →