Nutrition report ready

San jacobos de pollo

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices for this Eroski product.

Nutri-Score D

View details

San jacobos de pollo

by Eroski in Chickens Barcode 8480010044737
Poor nutritional quality
Green-Score
e
Environmental impact estimate

San jacobos de pollo by Eroski provides 156 kcal per 100 g, with 0 g of sugars and 12 g of protein. That is 100% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D. It is listed in the Chickens category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
5.9 g · Moderate
Saturated fat
3.3 g · Moderate
Sugars
0 g · Low
Salt
2.5 g · High

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 156 kcal 162
Total fat 5.9 g 7.6 −22%
Saturated fat 3.3 g 2 +68%
Carbohydrates 13 g 5 +161%
Total sugars 0 g 1 −100%
Protein 12 g 18.4 −35%
Salt 2.5 g 1.3 +89%

Category average across 3722 Chickens products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other chickens

Calories lower 50%
Sugars lower 1%
Salt higher 5%
Saturated fat higher 18%
Protein top 90%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Labels & certifications
No gluten
Sold in
Spain
Barcode
8480010044737

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in San jacobos de pollo?

San jacobos de pollo contains 156 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in San jacobos de pollo?

San jacobos de pollo has 0 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is San jacobos de pollo healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 27, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried San jacobos de pollo? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More chickens

View all →

More from Eroski

View all →