Red Robin, Smoky Jack Tavern Double
Red Robin, Smoky Jack Tavern Double by Red Robin provides 664 kcal per 100 g, with 13 g of sugars and 36 g of protein. That is 145% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E. It is listed in the Hamburgers category and comes in a 1 serving(s) pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 100g
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 664 kcal | 664 kcal | 335 +98% | |
| Total fat | 40 g | 40 g | 51% | 24.3 +65% |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 15 g | 75% | 9.1 +64% |
| Carbohydrates | 40 g | 40 g | 15% | 24.4 +64% |
| Total sugars | 13 g | 13 g | 5.3 +145% | |
| Dietary fiber | 1 g | 1 g | 4% | 2.3 −57% |
| Protein | 36 g | 36 g | 72% | 22.3 +62% |
| Salt | 3 g | 3 g | 2.4 +24% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 1425 Hamburgers products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other hamburgers
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
undefined
Product details
- Quantity
- 1 serving(s)
- Serving size
- 100g
- Sold in
- United States
- Barcode
- 98388241380623613
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Red Robin, Smoky Jack Tavern Double?
Red Robin, Smoky Jack Tavern Double contains 664 kcal per 100 g and about 664 kcal per serving (100g).
How much sugar is in Red Robin, Smoky Jack Tavern Double?
Red Robin, Smoky Jack Tavern Double has 13 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered moderate by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Red Robin, Smoky Jack Tavern Double healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated February 21, 2025. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 
a 
a NOVA 4 More hamburgers
View all →
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
d NOVA 3 
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 3 More from Red Robin
View all →
c NOVA 4