Råsukker Biter 500g Dansukker

by Unil as 500 g in Sugars Barcode 7310340111056
Bad nutritional quality
Green-Score
a
Environmental impact estimate

Råsukker Biter 500g Dansukker by Unil as provides 400 kcal per 100 g, with 100 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. That is 30% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E. It is listed in the Sugars category and comes in a 500 g pack.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
0 g · Low
Saturated fat
0 g · Low
Sugars
100 g · High
Salt
0 g · Low

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 400 kcal 304 +32%
Total fat 0 g 0.5 −100%
Saturated fat 0 g 0.3 −100%
Carbohydrates 100 g 89.9 +11%
Total sugars 100 g 76.9 +30%
Added sugars 0 g 56.4 −100%
Protein 0 g 0.3 −100%
Salt 0 g 0.2 −100%

Category average across 2027 Sugars products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other sugars

Calories higher 30%
Sugars higher 49%
Salt lower 1%
Saturated fat lower 1%
Protein top 100%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Ingredients

Rørsukker

Product details

Quantity
500 g
Labels & certifications
No gluten
Sold in
Norway
Barcode
7310340111056

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Råsukker Biter 500g Dansukker?

Råsukker Biter 500g Dansukker contains 400 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Råsukker Biter 500g Dansukker?

Råsukker Biter 500g Dansukker has 100 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Råsukker Biter 500g Dansukker healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated July 16, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Råsukker Biter 500g Dansukker? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More sugars

View all →

More from Unil as

View all →