
View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
旺仔QQ糖(葡萄味)
旺仔QQ糖(葡萄味) by 旺仔 provides 302 kcal per 100 g, with 60 g of sugars and 6.1 g of protein. That is 22% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Sugars category and comes in a 23g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 302 kcal | 303 |
| Total fat | 0 g | 0.5 −100% |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 69.3 g | 89.9 −23% |
| Total sugars | 60 g | 76.9 −22% |
| Added sugars | 9.3 g | 56.3 −84% |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 1.4 −100% |
| Protein | 6.1 g | 0.3 +1946% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 −100% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 2024 Sugars products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other sugars
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
麦芽糖、白砂糖、葡萄糖(或食用葡萄糖)、浓缩苹果汁(还原后果汁含量≥5%)、食品添加剂(明胶、果胶、柠檬酸、山梨糖醇液、柠檬酸钠、维生素C/L-抗坏血酸、巴西棕榈蜡、对应口味的色素)、对应口味的香精
Additives 1
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 23g
- Sold in
- China
- Barcode
- 6921299762025
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Recipe & label changes
-
October 5, 2026
- Nutri-Score: — → d
- NOVA group: — → 4
- Calories: — → 301.6
- Fat: — → 0
- Saturated fat: — → 0
- Sugars: — → 60
- Salt: — → 0
- Protein: — → 6.1
- Fiber: — → 0
Changes to this product's label data recorded since Foodmetria started tracking it.
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in 旺仔QQ糖(葡萄味)?
旺仔QQ糖(葡萄味) contains 302 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in 旺仔QQ糖(葡萄味)?
旺仔QQ糖(葡萄味) has 60 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is 旺仔QQ糖(葡萄味) healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated October 5, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
b NOVA 2
a NOVA 4
a NOVA 4
c NOVA 2 More sugars
View all →
e
e NOVA 4
NOVA 4
e NOVA 2
e NOVA 2