Nutrition report ready

Porc au Brocciu AOP et Myrte

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices for this Charles Antona product.

Nutri-Score E

View details

Porc au Brocciu AOP et Myrte

by Charles Antona in Meats Barcode 3425471103222
Bad nutritional quality

Porc au Brocciu AOP et Myrte by Charles Antona provides 323 kcal per 100 g, with 1 g of sugars and 12 g of protein. Its Nutri-Score is E. It is listed in the Meats category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
28 g · High
Saturated fat
10 g · High
Sugars
1 g · Low
Salt
1.5 g · Moderate

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 323 kcal 205 +58%
Total fat 28 g 12.9 +117%
Saturated fat 10 g 4.8 +107%
Carbohydrates 2.6 g 3.6 −28%
Total sugars 1 g 1
Protein 12 g 18.4 −35%
Salt 1.5 g 1.5

Category average across 3358 Meats products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other meats

Calories higher 10%
Sugars higher 28%
Salt higher 39%
Saturated fat higher 12%
Protein top 88%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Labels & certifications
PDO
Sold in
France
Barcode
3425471103222

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Porc au Brocciu AOP et Myrte?

Porc au Brocciu AOP et Myrte contains 323 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Porc au Brocciu AOP et Myrte?

Porc au Brocciu AOP et Myrte has 1 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Porc au Brocciu AOP et Myrte healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 26, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Porc au Brocciu AOP et Myrte? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More meats

View all →

More from Charles Antona

View all →