Nutrition report ready

Pollo asado

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices for this Eroski product.

Nutri-Score B

View details

Pollo asado

by Eroski in Chickens Barcode 2618199004969
Good nutritional quality
Green-Score
e
Environmental impact estimate

Pollo asado by Eroski provides 203 kcal per 100 g, with 0 g of sugars and 23 g of protein. That is 100% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is B. It is listed in the Chickens category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
12 g · Moderate
Saturated fat
3.3 g · Moderate
Sugars
0 g · Low
Salt
0.9 g · Moderate

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 203 kcal 162 +25%
Total fat 12 g 7.6 +59%
Saturated fat 3.3 g 2 +68%
Carbohydrates 0.7 g 5 −86%
Total sugars 0 g 1 −100%
Protein 23 g 18.4 +25%
Salt 0.9 g 1.3 −32%

Category average across 3723 Chickens products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other chickens

Calories higher 21%
Sugars lower 1%
Salt lower 42%
Saturated fat higher 18%
Protein top 18%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Labels & certifications
NutriscoreNutriscore Grade B
Sold in
Spain
Barcode
2618199004969

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Pollo asado?

Pollo asado contains 203 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Pollo asado?

Pollo asado has 0 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Pollo asado healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of B (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 27, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Pollo asado? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More chickens

View all →

More from Eroski

View all →