Pollo

by Eroski in Fresh meats Barcode 2630352004258

Filetes de pollo

Very good nutritional quality
Unprocessed or minimally processed

Pollo by Eroski provides 213 kcal per 100 g, with 0 g of sugars and 28.9 g of protein. That is 100% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is A and it is classified as NOVA 1 (unprocessed or minimally processed). It is listed in the Fresh meats category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
9.9 g · Moderate
Saturated fat
2.8 g · Moderate
Sugars
0 g · Low
Salt
0.4 g · Moderate

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 213 kcal 170 +25%
Total fat 9.9 g 9.1 +8%
Saturated fat 2.8 g 3.4 −17%
Carbohydrates 2.1 g 1.1 +86%
Total sugars 0 g 0.5 −100%
Added sugars 0 g 0.3 −100%
Dietary fiber 0 g 0.2 −100%
Protein 28.9 g 20.8 +39%
Salt 0.4 g 0.7 −44%

Category average across 145 Fresh meats products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other fresh meats

Calories higher 27%
Sugars lower 1%
Salt higher 47%
Saturated fat higher 45%
Protein top 11%
Fiber top 100%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Ingredients

POLLO

Palm oil freeNot veganNot vegetarian

Product details

Sold in
Spain
Barcode
2630352004258

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Pollo?

Pollo contains 213 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Pollo?

Pollo has 0 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Pollo healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of A (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 1 — unprocessed or minimally processed. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Is Pollo vegan?

Based on its ingredient list, it is not vegan.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 28, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Pollo? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More fresh meats

View all →

More from Eroski

View all →