View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Nata UHT ligera para cocinar
Nata UHT ligera para cocinar by Alcampo provides 194 kcal per 100 g, with 3.8 g of sugars and 2.5 g of protein. Its Nutri-Score is D and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Cremes legeres category.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 194 kcal | 167 +16% |
| Total fat | 18 g | 14.8 +21% |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 9.9 +22% |
| Carbohydrates | 5.5 g | 5.6 |
| Total sugars | 3.8 g | 4.1 −7% |
| Added sugars | 0 g | 0.1 −100% |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 2.8 −10% |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 −20% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 331 Cremes legeres products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other cremes legeres
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Nata de leche de vaca (18% M.G.), almidón modificado de maíz, emulgente (E-471), espesantes (E-460, E-466 y E-415) y estabilizante (E-451).
Additives 5
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Sold in
- Spain
- Barcode
- 8414700000246
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Nata UHT ligera para cocinar?
Nata UHT ligera para cocinar contains 194 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Nata UHT ligera para cocinar?
Nata UHT ligera para cocinar has 3.8 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Nata UHT ligera para cocinar healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 27, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
b NOVA 1 
d NOVA 1 
d NOVA 1 
d NOVA 3 More cremes legeres
View all →
d NOVA 3 
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 More from Alcampo
View all →
b 
e NOVA 3 
a 
c NOVA 1 