Mongo Con Chile
Mongo Con Chile by Royal Snacks provides 250 kcal per 100 g, with 55 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. That is 193% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Snacks category.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 40 g (40 g)
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 kcal | 100 kcal | 453 −45% | |
| Total fat | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 25.3 −100% |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 6.8 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 82.5 g | 33 g | 12% | 48.9 +69% |
| Total sugars | 55 g | 22 g | 18.8 +193% | |
| Dietary fiber | 2.5 g | 1 g | 4% | 6.7 −63% |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 13.3 −100% |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.4 g | 1.1 −13% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 35657 Snacks products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other snacks
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Mango, sugar, chile pepper powder, paprika, citric acid, salt, lemon flavor, sulfur dioxide, yellow color #5 and #6.
Additives 2
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Serving size
- 40 g (40 g)
- Sold in
- United States
- Barcode
- 0868654261099
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Mongo Con Chile?
Mongo Con Chile contains 250 kcal per 100 g and about 100 kcal per serving (40 g (40 g)).
How much sugar is in Mongo Con Chile?
Mongo Con Chile has 55 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Mongo Con Chile healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated April 22, 2020. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 3 
a NOVA 4 
c NOVA 1 
c NOVA 1 More snacks
View all →
d NOVA 3 
d NOVA 4 
e NOVA 3 
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4