Mangalica tepertőkrém

by Imki 200 g in Spreadable fats Barcode 5999882848068
Bad nutritional quality
Processed food

Mangalica tepertőkrém by Imki provides 676 kcal per 100 g, with 0.4 g of sugars and 12.3 g of protein. That is 61% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 3 (processed food). It is listed in the Spreadable fats category and comes in a 200 g pack.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
69.3 g · High
Saturated fat
28.3 g · High
Sugars
0.4 g · Low
Salt
0.9 g · Moderate

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 676 kcal 579 +17%
Total fat 69.3 g 62.6 +11%
Saturated fat 28.3 g 26.9 +5%
Carbohydrates 1 g 2.1 −52%
Total sugars 0.4 g 1 −61%
Protein 12.3 g 1.9 +562%
Salt 0.9 g 1 −7%

Category average across 206 Spreadable fats products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other spreadable fats

Calories higher 33%
Sugars lower 36%
Salt lower 49%
Saturated fat higher 40%
Protein top 5%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Ingredients

Mangalica szalonna, étkezési só, fekete bors.

Product details

Quantity
200 g
Sold in
Hungary
Barcode
5999882848068

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Mangalica tepertőkrém?

Mangalica tepertőkrém contains 676 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Mangalica tepertőkrém?

Mangalica tepertőkrém has 0.4 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Mangalica tepertőkrém healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 3 — processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated June 22, 2022. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Mangalica tepertőkrém? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More spreadable fats

View all →

More from Imki

View all →