Mąka z ciecierzycy

1kg in Chickpea flours Barcode 5906827015119
Not enough data to compute
Unprocessed or minimally processed
Green-Score
a
Environmental impact estimate

Mąka z ciecierzycy provides 359 kcal per 100 g, with 10.9 g of sugars and 22.4 g of protein. That is 126% more sugar than the average product in this category. It is classified as NOVA 1 (unprocessed or minimally processed). It is listed in the Chickpea flours category and comes in a 1kg pack.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
6.7 g · Moderate
Sugars
10.9 g · Moderate
Salt
0.2 g · Low

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 359 kcal 352
Total fat 6.7 g 6.1 +9%
Carbohydrates 47 g 49.6 −5%
Total sugars 10.9 g 4.8 +126%
Added sugars 0 g 0.2 −100%
Dietary fiber 10.8 g 12.1 −11%
Protein 22.4 g 20.7 +8%
Salt 0.2 g 0.2 −34%

Category average across 182 Chickpea flours products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other chickpea flours

Calories higher 34%
Sugars higher 10%
Salt higher 22%
Protein top 17%
Fiber top 58%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Ingredients

100% mąka z ciecierzycy. Produkt może zawierać gluten pochodzący ze zboż

Product details

Quantity
1kg
Sold in
Poland
Barcode
5906827015119

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Mąka z ciecierzycy?

Mąka z ciecierzycy contains 359 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Mąka z ciecierzycy?

Mąka z ciecierzycy has 10.9 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered moderate by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Mąka z ciecierzycy healthy?

It is in NOVA group 1 — unprocessed or minimally processed. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated April 1, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Mąka z ciecierzycy? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More chickpea flours

View all →