Nutrition report ready

Kokosblütenzucker

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices.

Nutri-Score E NOVA 2

View details

Kokosblütenzucker

in Sugars Barcode 4335619257979
Bad nutritional quality
Processed culinary ingredient
Green-Score
a
Environmental impact estimate

Kokosblütenzucker provides 392 kcal per 100 g, with 83 g of sugars and 1.4 g of protein. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 2 (processed culinary ingredient). It is listed in the Sugars category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
0.5 g · Low
Saturated fat
0.1 g · Low
Sugars
83 g · High
Salt
0.3 g · Low

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 392 kcal 303 +29%
Total fat 0.5 g 0.5
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.3 −70%
Carbohydrates 95 g 89.9 +6%
Total sugars 83 g 76.9 +8%
Dietary fiber 0.7 g 1.4 −51%
Protein 1.4 g 0.3 +370%
Salt 0.3 g 0.2 +90%

Category average across 2024 Sugars products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other sugars

Calories higher 40%
Sugars lower 27%
Salt higher 5%
Saturated fat higher 11%
Protein top 6%
Fiber top 10%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Sold in
Germany
Barcode
4335619257979

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Kokosblütenzucker?

Kokosblütenzucker contains 392 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Kokosblütenzucker?

Kokosblütenzucker has 83 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Kokosblütenzucker healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 2 — processed culinary ingredient. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated May 7, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Kokosblütenzucker? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More sugars

View all →