View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Kacsa és Liba tepertőkrém - csemege
Kacsa és Liba tepertőkrém - csemege by PrimFett provides 900 kcal per 100 g, with 0 g of sugars and 11 g of protein. That is 100% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E. It is listed in the Spreadable fats category and comes in a 250 g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 900 kcal | 579 +55% |
| Total fat | 99 g | 62.6 +58% |
| Saturated fat | 28 g | 26.9 |
| Carbohydrates | 0 g | 2.1 −100% |
| Total sugars | 0 g | 1 −100% |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 0.5 −100% |
| Protein | 11 g | 1.9 +492% |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 1 −48% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 206 Spreadable fats products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other spreadable fats
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Tiba - és kacsatepertő 200 g, libazsír, só, csemege pirospaprika.
Product details
- Quantity
- 250 g
- Sold in
- Hungary
- Barcode
- 5999886783112
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Kacsa és Liba tepertőkrém - csemege?
Kacsa és Liba tepertőkrém - csemege contains 900 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Kacsa és Liba tepertőkrém - csemege?
Kacsa és Liba tepertőkrém - csemege has 0 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Kacsa és Liba tepertőkrém - csemege healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Is Kacsa és Liba tepertőkrém - csemege vegan?
Based on its ingredient list, it is not vegan.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated February 11, 2022. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
c
c NOVA 4
c NOVA 4
d More spreadable fats
View all →
d NOVA 4
e NOVA 3
d NOVA 4
d NOVA 1
d NOVA 3
e NOVA 4