View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Hausmacher Griebenschmalz
Hausmacher Griebenschmalz by Wilhelm Brandenburg provides 840 kcal per 100 g, with 0.5 g of sugars and 7 g of protein. That is 64% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Animal fats category and comes in a 125 g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 840 kcal | 751 +12% |
| Total fat | 90 g | 80.8 +11% |
| Saturated fat | 42 g | 35.4 +19% |
| Carbohydrates | 0.6 g | 3.3 −82% |
| Total sugars | 0.5 g | 1.4 −64% |
| Added sugars | 0.5 g | 0.2 +119% |
| Protein | 7 g | 1.9 +272% |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 0.5 +175% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 128 Animal fats products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other animal fats
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Schweineschmalz, Grieben, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Zucker, Gewürze, Dextrose, Gewürzextrakte.
Product details
- Quantity
- 125 g
- Sold in
- Germany
- Barcode
- 4388860234534
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Hausmacher Griebenschmalz?
Hausmacher Griebenschmalz contains 840 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Hausmacher Griebenschmalz?
Hausmacher Griebenschmalz has 0.5 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Hausmacher Griebenschmalz healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 25, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
b NOVA 2 
b NOVA 2 
b NOVA 2 
c NOVA 2 More animal fats
View all →
d NOVA 4 
NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 2 
d NOVA 2 
c NOVA 4 More from Wilhelm Brandenburg
View all →
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 3