View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Gelierzucker
Gelierzucker by Aarberg provides 395 kcal per 100 g, with 0 g of sugars and 0 g of protein. That is 100% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is C and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Sugars category and comes in a 1kg pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 100 g
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 395 kcal | 395 kcal | 304 +30% | |
| Total fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g | 1% | 0.5 |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 0.3 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 98 g | 98 g | 36% | 89.9 +9% |
| Total sugars | 0 g | 0 g | 76.9 −100% | |
| Added sugars | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 56.4 −100% |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 0.3 −100% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g | 0.2 −100% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 2027 Sugars products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other sugars
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Zucker aus Zuckerrüben, Geliermittel (Pektin), Säurungsmittel (Zitronensäure), Palmkernöl
Additives 2
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 1kg
- Serving size
- 100 g
- Sold in
- Germany, Switzerland
- Barcode
- 7610278033605
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Gelierzucker?
Gelierzucker contains 395 kcal per 100 g and about 395 kcal per serving (100 g).
How much sugar is in Gelierzucker?
Gelierzucker has 0 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Gelierzucker healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of C (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 25, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 
c NOVA 2 
NOVA 2 More sugars
View all →
e 
NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
NOVA 4 
e NOVA 2 More from Aarberg
View all →
NOVA 2 
e NOVA 4 
NOVA 2 
e NOVA 2 
NOVA 2 
c