View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Domača zaseka
Domača zaseka by mesarija kragelj provides 662 kcal per 100 g, with 0 g of sugars and 10.1 g of protein. That is 100% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 2 (processed culinary ingredient). It is listed in the Lards category and comes in a 300 g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 662 kcal | 808 −18% |
| Total fat | 71.2 g | 88 −19% |
| Saturated fat | 31.2 g | 36.8 −15% |
| Carbohydrates | 1 g | 0.8 +31% |
| Total sugars | 0 g | 0.4 −100% |
| Added sugars | 0 g | 0.5 −100% |
| Protein | 10.1 g | 2.7 +280% |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 0.9 +144% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 123 Lards products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other lards
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
mesna slanina, svinjsko meso, sol, začimbe, konzervans (E 250)
Additives 1
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 300 g
- Sold in
- Italy
- Barcode
- 3830023500006
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Domača zaseka?
Domača zaseka contains 662 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Domača zaseka?
Domača zaseka has 0 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Domača zaseka healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 2 — processed culinary ingredient. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Is Domača zaseka vegan?
Based on its ingredient list, it is not vegan.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 30, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
b NOVA 2 
c NOVA 2 
c NOVA 2 
c NOVA 2 More lards
View all →
e NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
d 
d NOVA 2 
d 
e