Diced Pork Shoulder

by Slow Cook in Pork Barcode 00346863
Average nutritional quality

Diced Pork Shoulder by Slow Cook provides 234 kcal per 100 g, with 0.5 g of sugars and 27.3 g of protein. That is 38% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is C. It is listed in the Pork category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
13.4 g · Moderate
Saturated fat
4.6 g · Moderate
Sugars
0.5 g · Low
Salt
0.1 g · Low

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Serving size: 100g

Nutrient Per 100 g Per serving% DV* Category avg
Calories 234 kcal 234 kcal 204 +15%
Total fat 13.4 g 13.4 g 17% 12.7 +5%
Saturated fat 4.6 g 4.6 g 23% 4.7
Carbohydrates 0.6 g 0.6 g 0% 1.8 −67%
Total sugars 0.5 g 0.5 g 0.8 −38%
Dietary fiber 0.8 g 0.8 g 3% 0.3 +176%
Protein 27.3 g 27.3 g 55% 20.6 +33%
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g 1.9 −95%

*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 2139 Pork products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other pork

Calories higher 28%
Sugars lower 39%
Salt lower 2%
Saturated fat higher 38%
Protein top 10%
Fiber top 11%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Serving size
100g
Sold in
United Kingdom
Barcode
00346863

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Diced Pork Shoulder?

Diced Pork Shoulder contains 234 kcal per 100 g and about 234 kcal per serving (100g).

How much sugar is in Diced Pork Shoulder?

Diced Pork Shoulder has 0.5 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Diced Pork Shoulder healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of C (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 27, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Diced Pork Shoulder? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More pork

View all →