View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Confit de fleur de violette
Confit de fleur de violette by Albert Ménès provides 254 kcal per 100 g, with 61 g of sugars and 0.3 g of protein. Its Nutri-Score is D and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Flower preserves category and comes in a 220 g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 254 kcal | 244 |
| Total fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 −81% |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 −72% |
| Carbohydrates | 64 g | 59.8 +7% |
| Total sugars | 61 g | 55.8 +9% |
| Added sugars | 60 g | 53.9 +11% |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0.6 −53% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 −95% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 27 Flower preserves products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other flower preserves
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
sucre de canne, eau, fleurs de violette, gélifiant : pectine de fruits, acidifiant: acide citrique.
Additives 2
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 220 g
- Sold in
- France
- Barcode
- 3234750038021
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Confit de fleur de violette?
Confit de fleur de violette contains 254 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Confit de fleur de violette?
Confit de fleur de violette has 61 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Confit de fleur de violette healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 19, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
More flower preserves
View all →
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 More from Albert Ménès
View all →
NOVA 3 
NOVA 1 
e NOVA 3 
c NOVA 4 
NOVA 1