Nutrition report ready

Classic spicy slow-simmered two-bean chili, classic

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices.

Nutri-Score C NOVA 4

View details

Classic spicy slow-simmered two-bean chili, classic

in Stews Barcode 0071106783302
Average nutritional quality
Ultra-processed food

Classic spicy slow-simmered two-bean chili, classic provides 113 kcal per 100 g, with 3.2 g of sugars and 6.5 g of protein. That is 48% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is C and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Stews category. Contains: beef, pork.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
4.9 g · Moderate
Saturated fat
1.8 g · Moderate
Sugars
3.2 g · Low
Salt
0.9 g · Moderate

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Serving size: 1 cup (247 g)

Nutrient Per 100 g Per serving% DV* Category avg
Calories 113 kcal 279 kcal 99 +15%
Total fat 4.9 g 12 g 15% 3.8 +28%
Saturated fat 1.8 g 4.5 g 23% 1.3 +38%
Carbohydrates 10.9 g 27 g 10% 10.6
Total sugars 3.2 g 8 g 2.2 +48%
Dietary fiber 2.4 g 5.9 g 21% 2.1 +15%
Protein 6.5 g 16 g 32% 4.9 +33%
Salt 0.9 g 2.3 g 0.9 +7%

*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 1185 Stews products on Foodmetria.

Serving size from the US product label in USDA FoodData Central, label data from December 2019. Other values: Open Food Facts.

Nutrition claims check

Claims its numbers support

High protein
23% of calories from protein (EU: at least 20% of calories from protein)
Low sugar
3.2 g sugars per 100 g (EU: no more than 5 g per 100 g)
Source of fiber
2.4 g fiber per 100 g (EU: at least 3 g per 100 g or 1.5 g per 100 kcal)

Checked against the per-100 g thresholds of EU Regulation 1924/2006, using the nutrition data above. US labels follow FDA rules, which are mostly based on serving size and can give a different result; FDA has no defined “low sugar” claim.

Compared with other stews

Calories higher 24%
Sugars higher 17%
Salt higher 42%
Saturated fat higher 25%
Protein top 23%
Fiber top 38%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Ingredients

Water, beef, tomatoes in juice (contains calcium chloride, citric acid), kidney beans, pink beans, pork, tomato paste, dehydrated onions, contains 2% or less of beef broth, chili powder (chili peppers, flavoring), jalapeno peppers, salt, flavoring, sugar, cornstarch, dehydrated green bell pepper, paprika.

Palm oil freeNot veganNot vegetarian
Allergens
BeefPork

Additives 1

Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.

Product details

Serving size
1 cup (247 g)
Sold in
United States
Barcode
0071106783302

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Classic spicy slow-simmered two-bean chili, classic?

Classic spicy slow-simmered two-bean chili, classic contains 113 kcal per 100 g and about 279 kcal per serving (1 cup (247 g)).

How much sugar is in Classic spicy slow-simmered two-bean chili, classic?

Classic spicy slow-simmered two-bean chili, classic has 3.2 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Classic spicy slow-simmered two-bean chili, classic healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of C (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Is Classic spicy slow-simmered two-bean chili, classic vegan?

Based on its ingredient list, it is not vegan.

What allergens does Classic spicy slow-simmered two-bean chili, classic contain?

According to the label data it contains: Beef, Pork. Recipes change — always check the package label.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated April 23, 2020. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Classic spicy slow-simmered two-bean chili, classic? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More stews

View all →