View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
涉素牛肉
Dried vegetarian beef snacks
涉素牛肉 by ZHEN XIANG provides 423 kcal per 100 g, with 2.5 g of sugars and 18.4 g of protein. That is 87% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Snacks category and comes in a 80 g pack. Contains: soybeans.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 423 kcal | 453 −7% |
| Total fat | 11.4 g | 25.3 −55% |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 6.8 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 61.7 g | 48.9 +26% |
| Total sugars | 2.5 g | 18.8 −87% |
| Added sugars | 2.5 g | 8.8 −72% |
| Protein | 18.4 g | 13.3 +38% |
| Salt | 4 g | 1.1 +265% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 35657 Snacks products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other snacks
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Soy flour, sugar, palm oil, salt, spices, flavoured oil, monosodium glutamate, potassium sorbate.
- Allergens
- Soybeans
Additives 2
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 80 g
- Sold in
- France
- Barcode
- 6918768951684
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in 涉素牛肉?
涉素牛肉 contains 423 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in 涉素牛肉?
涉素牛肉 has 2.5 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is 涉素牛肉 healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
What allergens does 涉素牛肉 contain?
According to the label data it contains: Soybeans. Recipes change — always check the package label.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 25, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 3 
a NOVA 4 
c NOVA 3 
c NOVA 3 More snacks
View all →
d NOVA 3 
d NOVA 4 
e NOVA 3 
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4