Comparison
Zimt vs Zimt
Overall, Zimt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Zimt | Zimt |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 64 kcal | 399 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 4.8 g | 92.3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | — |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Zimt has 84% fewer calories (64 kcal vs 399 kcal).
- Zimt has 86% less fat (0.5 g vs 3.5 g).
- Zimt has 78% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 2.3 g).
- Zimt has 95% less sugar (4.8 g vs 92.3 g).
- Zimt has 97% more protein (3.3 g vs 0.1 g).
Ingredients
Zimt
Kann Spuren von Weizen, Soja, Milch, Senf, Sellerie, Sesam und Nüssen ent - halten.
Zimt
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Zimt or Zimt?
Overall, Zimt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Zimt has fewer calories: 64 kcal versus 399 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Zimt has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 92.3 g per 100 g.