Comparison
Young Gouda vs Gouda Jung
Overall, Young Gouda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Young Gouda | Gouda Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 368 kcal | 344 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 27.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 19.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 23.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Young Gouda has 20% less salt (1.6 g vs 2 g).
Ingredients
Young Gouda
Gouda (_milk_).
Gouda Jung
Pasteurisierte Kuhmilch, Speisesalz, Starterkulturen, mikrobielles Lab.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Young Gouda or Gouda Jung?
Overall, Young Gouda has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gouda Jung has fewer calories: 344 kcal versus 368 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Young Gouda has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.