Comparison

Whole 3.7% Fat Milk vs Amul Taaza Milky Milk

Overall, Whole 3.7% Fat Milk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Better choice

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Whole 3.7% Fat Milk	Amul Taaza Milky Milk
Nutri-Score	c	c
NOVA group	—	—
Calories	66 kcal	62 kcal
Fat	3.7 g	3.5 g
Saturated fat	2.4 g	2.1 g
Sugars	4.7 g	4.7 g
Salt	0.1 g	0.1 g
Fiber	0.5 g	—
Protein	3.5 g	3 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Whole 3.7% Fat Milk has 14% more protein (3.5 g vs 3 g).
Only Amul Taaza Milky Milk lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Whole 3.7% Fat Milk

Pasteurised homogenised Standardised whole milk

Amul Taaza Milky Milk

PASTEURISED HOMOGENISED TONED MILK

FAQ

Which is healthier: Whole 3.7% Fat Milk or Amul Taaza Milky Milk?

Overall, Whole 3.7% Fat Milk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Amul Taaza Milky Milk has fewer calories: 62 kcal versus 66 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Whole 3.7% Fat Milk has less sugar: 4.7 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Whole 3.7% Fat Milk vs Welsh Milk Whole Whole 3.7% Fat Milk vs Lait de Bretagne Lait pa... Whole 3.7% Fat Milk vs Helmelk 3,5% Whole 3.7% Fat Milk vs GrandLait bio entier Whole 3.7% Fat Milk vs Uht jibal 1/2L Uht jibal 1/2L vs Amul Taaza Milky Milk Lait entier vs Amul Taaza Milky Milk Welsh Milk Whole vs Amul Taaza Milky Milk