Weizenmehl Type 1050 vs Weizenmehl Type 1050
Overall, Weizenmehl Type 1050 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Weizenmehl Type 1050 | Weizenmehl Type 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 343 kcal | 338 kcal |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5.2 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Weizenmehl Type 1050 has 39% less fat (1.1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Weizenmehl Type 1050 has 64% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
- Weizenmehl Type 1050 has 23% more fiber (5.2 g vs 4 g).
Ingredients
Weizenmehl Type 1050
Weizenmehl
Weizenmehl Type 1050
Weizenmehl
FAQ
Which is healthier: Weizenmehl Type 1050 or Weizenmehl Type 1050?
Overall, Weizenmehl Type 1050 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Weizenmehl Type 1050 has fewer calories: 338 kcal versus 343 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Weizenmehl Type 1050 has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.