Comparison

Weizenmehl Type 1050 vs Weizenmehl Type 1050

Overall, Weizenmehl Type 1050 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Better choice
Weizenmehl Type 1050

Weizenmehl Type 1050

Belbake · 1 kg
a NOVA 1
Weizenmehl Type 1050

Weizenmehl Type 1050

DmBio · 1000 g
a NOVA 1

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWeizenmehl Type 1050Weizenmehl Type 1050
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 347 kcal 343 kcal
Fat 1.8 g 1.8 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0.3 g
Sugars 0.7 g 1.4 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 5.5 g 5.2 g
Protein 12 g 12 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Weizenmehl Type 1050 has 50% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.4 g).

Ingredients

Weizenmehl Type 1050

Bio Weizenmehl 100%

Weizenmehl Type 1050

Weizenmehl

FAQ

Which is healthier: Weizenmehl Type 1050 or Weizenmehl Type 1050?

Overall, Weizenmehl Type 1050 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Weizenmehl Type 1050 has fewer calories: 343 kcal versus 347 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Weizenmehl Type 1050 has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Farine de blé français s... vs Weizenmehl Type 1050 Farine de blé français s... vs Weizenmehl Type 1050 Farine de blé grise T110 vs Weizenmehl Type 1050 Farine de blé grise T110 vs Weizenmehl Type 1050 Farine semi-complète de... vs Weizenmehl Type 1050 Farine semi-complète de... vs Weizenmehl Type 1050 Weizenmehl Type 1050 vs Weizenmehl Type 1050 Weizenmehl Type 1050 vs Weizenmehl Type 1050