Warcollier vs Sfilacci di equino
Overall, Sfilacci di equino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Warcollier | Sfilacci di equino |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 365 kcal | 186 kcal |
| Fat | 22.5 g | 4.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.2 g | 1.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 4.6 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 38.8 g | 35.8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sfilacci di equino has 49% fewer calories (186 kcal vs 365 kcal).
- Sfilacci di equino has 79% less fat (4.7 g vs 22.5 g).
- Sfilacci di equino has 80% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 9.2 g).
- Sfilacci di equino has 62% less salt (1.8 g vs 4.6 g).
- Sfilacci di equino has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Warcollier lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Warcollier
lukanka from veal , horse meat ingredients: dry salami, made by 50% veal and 50% horse meat, salt, sugar, natural spices, preservative-rosemary extract and potassium nitrate, antioxidant - ascorbic acid, natural product free of gmo, gluten and meat substitutes, 100g ready product are made by 182g fresh meat, casing-inedible, storage conditions: 0° 8°c
Sfilacci di equino
Carne di Equino, sale, destrosio, saccarosio, aromi naturali, spezie, aromi, antiossidante: E 301, conservante: E 250. AFFUMICATO CON LEGNO DI FAGGIO
FAQ
Which is healthier: Warcollier or Sfilacci di equino?
Overall, Sfilacci di equino has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sfilacci di equino has fewer calories: 186 kcal versus 365 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Warcollier has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.