Want want sea salt rice crackers vs Cosmic Rainbow C4 Energy
Overall, Cosmic Rainbow C4 Energy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Want want sea salt rice crac... | Cosmic Rainbow C4 Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 533 kcal | 5 kcal |
| Fat | 26.7 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 13.3 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cosmic Rainbow C4 Energy has 99% fewer calories (5 kcal vs 533 kcal).
- Cosmic Rainbow C4 Energy has no fat, while Want want sea salt rice crackers has 26.7 g.
- Cosmic Rainbow C4 Energy has no saturated fat, while Want want sea salt rice crackers has 13.3 g.
- Cosmic Rainbow C4 Energy has no salt, while Want want sea salt rice crackers has 1.9 g.
- Want want sea salt rice crackers has 100% more protein (3.3 g vs 0 g).
- Cosmic Rainbow C4 Energy has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Want want sea salt rice crackers
Not available.
Cosmic Rainbow C4 Energy
Water, Natural Flavouring, Carbon Dioxide, Acidity Regulators (Malic Acid and Citric Acid), L-Arginine (0.21%), Taurine (0.21%), Betaine (BetaPower®), Sweeteners (Sucralose and Steviol Glycosides), Caffeine Anhydrous, Niacinamide, Cyanocobalamin.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Want want sea salt rice crackers or Cosmic Rainbow C4 Energy?
Overall, Cosmic Rainbow C4 Energy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cosmic Rainbow C4 Energy has fewer calories: 5 kcal versus 533 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Want want sea salt rice crackers has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.