Comparison

Cosmic Rainbow C4 Energy vs Energy Drink

Overall, Energy Drink has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientCosmic Rainbow C4 EnergyEnergy Drink
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 5 kcal 19 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 3.1 g
Salt 0 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 0 g 0.3 g
Additives56
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cosmic Rainbow C4 Energy has 73% fewer calories (5 kcal vs 19 kcal).
  • Cosmic Rainbow C4 Energy has no sugar, while Energy Drink has 3.1 g.
  • Energy Drink has 100% more protein (0.3 g vs 0 g).
  • Energy Drink has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Cosmic Rainbow C4 Energy

Water, Natural Flavouring, Carbon Dioxide, Acidity Regulators (Malic Acid and Citric Acid), L-Arginine (0.21%), Taurine (0.21%), Betaine (BetaPower®), Sweeteners (Sucralose and Steviol Glycosides), Caffeine Anhydrous, Niacinamide, Cyanocobalamin.

Energy Drink

Koolzuurhoudend water, suiker, glucosestroop, voedingszuur (citroenzuur [E330]), taurine, zuurteregelaar (natriumcitraten [E331]), aroma, kleurstof (alkali-sulfietkaramel [E150b]), cafeïne, zoetstof (acesulfaam-K [E950], sucralose [E955]), vitaminen (niacine, pantotheenzuur, B6, riboflavine, B12), conserveermiddel (kaliumsorbaat [E202]). Waarvan toegevoegde suikers 3.1g per 100 milliliter en waarvan toegevoegd zout 0.00g per 100 milliliter

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cosmic Rainbow C4 Energy or Energy Drink?

Overall, Energy Drink has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cosmic Rainbow C4 Energy has fewer calories: 5 kcal versus 19 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cosmic Rainbow C4 Energy has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons