Walnusskerne vs Nuez natural pelada
Overall, Nuez natural pelada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Walnusskerne | Nuez natural pelada |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 730 kcal | 716 kcal |
| Fat | 71.2 g | 69.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.9 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 2.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4.5 g | 6.2 g |
| Protein | 15.8 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nuez natural pelada has 13% less saturated fat (6 g vs 6.9 g).
- Nuez natural pelada has 37% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.7 g).
- Nuez natural pelada has 27% more fiber (6.2 g vs 4.5 g).
Ingredients
Walnusskerne
_Walnusskerne_
Nuez natural pelada
_Nueces_.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Walnusskerne or Nuez natural pelada?
Overall, Nuez natural pelada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nuez natural pelada has fewer calories: 716 kcal versus 730 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nuez natural pelada has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.