Comparison

Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... vs Pousses de bambou en tranches à l'eau

Overall, Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientVitasia Bambus Sprossen In S...Pousses de bambou en tranche...
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 11 kcal 13 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 1.7 g 0.8 g
Protein 0.8 g 0.8 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... has no sugar, while Pousses de bambou en tranches à l'eau has 0.5 g.
  • Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... has 53% more fiber (1.7 g vs 0.8 g).

Ingredients

Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ...

55% pousse de bambou, eau, acide citrique.

Pousses de bambou en tranches à l'eau

Pousses de bambou 55%, eau

FAQ

Which is healthier: Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... or Pousses de bambou en tranches à l'eau?

Overall, Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 13 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons