Comparison

Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... vs Bambussprossen in Scheiben

Overall, Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientVitasia Bambus Sprossen In S...Bambussprossen in Scheiben
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 11 kcal 21 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 0.7 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1.7 g 0.6 g
Protein 0.8 g 1.6 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... has 48% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 21 kcal).
  • Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... has no fat, while Bambussprossen in Scheiben has 0.5 g.
  • Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... has no sugar, while Bambussprossen in Scheiben has 0.7 g.
  • Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... has 65% more fiber (1.7 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Bambussprossen in Scheiben has 50% more protein (1.6 g vs 0.8 g).

Ingredients

Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ...

55% pousse de bambou, eau, acide citrique.

Bambussprossen in Scheiben

Bambussprossen, Wasser.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... or Bambussprossen in Scheiben?

Overall, Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 21 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons